NLP & Inner game

[Donatello]

Did or has anyone actually realised that it does nt matter how much NLP or \"Inner game\" that you use if you have the Incorrect Paragim of Society?

I came to realise that it does nt really matter how much or how good your game (Direct / Indirect, Inner game or NLP) that you use your success with women is still random if you have the incorrect paragim model of society, (WOman is = to men, or woman has more power than men). The correct model is that man is above woman, top of the food chain. Head of teh house hold. End of story. There are no exceptions.

If you live in teh false reality where Social** = Sexual, then you, I am afriaid are leeking away apart of your inherent masculine power. It is to say if you see a hot assed blonde in skin tight jeans low cut top, enseñando las tetas and you refere to this as her being attractive, (or are left open mouthed, stutering or momentarly losing your concentration) then you are living in the false reality, created by our media, propagation of a womans sexuality or sexploitation. This, the hot blonde, ultra hottie is just a (our, western first world civilation) socio-cultural abductation of a womans sexuality, as in other cultures such as asian, arab they would consider such an image as disgusting and unattractive.

Live in the natural world where Natural** = Sexual. She was born to be the carer, to bear children to look after the house hold and the family. It´s in her biological make up to be that way. It does nt matter how much her social programming is to be a powerful independent woman, she cannot fight mother nature, her own biological responce and her DNA (ADN).

A woman that is sexploiting herself and her image (wearing sexy clothers, etc) is really just out fishing for man, or male company....the sexier or more she exploits this, well quite frankly the more she is fishing for male attention.

The only frame I have these days is \"when a woman gets to know me, she will absolutly fall in love with me, as it is in her natural and emotional nature to do so\"

and

\"its always on\".

Understand this and you will be just be beginning to press the \"turbo\" botton on your game. I gave up on inner game a long time ago...and tecniques (and NLP) and replaced it all with what is written above, and a few other concepts such as being the centre (rock solid centre) of your universe and getting girls to orbit your world like an orbita satellite. so if required go read again and understand it. Under no circumstances will I enter a girls world and become apart or part of her orbital universe, not for even the most prettyest/sexiest/hottest girl . I will NEVER sell up on my dignity or lose my much valued masculinity just \"to be lucky to be near/around her, her royal princess\". No way...just no fucking way! Some things just have no price.

Knowledge + Inaction = Zero

PUssy Control

Donatello

** = social character y Natural Character.

[Lou]

I believe in evolution. Man is violent by nature, but man as a logical being, can decide to be violent or can decide to control himself.

By same matters, man is \"sexual\" by nature, but there is strange? people that stay whole life in castity (neither wanking

Also looking to girls as inferior beings is the most wrong mistake you can make, because your are \"reprograming\" (then you are inducing your own inner game, while you are critizing it btw) this that is fully demonstrated in the society.

Today, there are \"alpha\" girls that dominate loads of guys. Surely an alpha guy can dominate an alpha girl, as an alpha guy can dominate another alpha man This are matters of leaderships.

But surely if you have a wrong \"reality\" (apart that it helps your inner game to push foward) it won\'t help you get whatever you want: this is demonstrated. Example: this kind of super-direct guy that feels that he is the top of the sky super-alpha-minded... but he gets *constantly* rejected during one night, until...at last he fucks with a LSE (low self-esteem) girl

I SEE THIS -ALWAYS-

On the other side I see guys, that KILLED their ËGO and naturally their are super-attractive to girls. They are like a powerhouse, like the oracle that will make their lives happy -amazing!- but true.

Is not that simple my friend. Just changing a reality into your reality, might help... not everybody.

Have fun

[Donatello]

SirLouen wrote:

I believe in

its not about what you belive in.

Also looking to girls as inferior beings is the most wrong mistake you can make, because your are \"reprograming\" (then you are inducing your own inner game, while you are critizing it btw) this that is fully demonstrated in the society.

this is the exact reprogrammig that society needs, I do not look to women as inferior but as the weaker sex.
if you are not the king of your world ruler of your destiny...how do you expect a woman to follow you in your life path? a man has to be stronger more dominate, not just for biological reasons, take physological resons into it...a woman has to (in the sexual process, weather for pleasure or repruductive reasons) accept something entering her body, thus she has to submit to the male counter part.

there is no exception to this in the animal world.

[Donatello]

SirLouen wrote:

Today, there are \"alpha\" girls that dominate loads of guys.

That may be so, but it is not natural, maybe you should read my 40 page ebook the wussification of the western male\"
in order to understand what caused teh wussie in the firs place.

[Lou]

I agree with you, but you might remember that this *involves* inner game

[Donatello]

SirLouen wrote:

But surely if you have a wrong \"reality\" (apart that it helps your inner game to push foward) it won\'t help you get whatever you want.

If you have the wrong reality, then you are pushing the pussy up on a pedestal, that will not help in any case (unless you are willing to put up with a lot of (unneccessary and unneeded, unwanted ) drama!
50-50 relationships do not work either, see the bigger picture.

In todays society we have divorcees that are handing out marriage advice, Mariage guidance councillers that are divorced them selves, how f*cked up is that.
so how is this for an equation
50-50 relationships = 50% divorce ratio we have in the western world.

look to the difference between women in the civilised first world, in comparison to women from countrys that still hold traditional values, where the woman look after the home and the children. While the male provides. western women sayy these woman are repressed. , they are missing a huge point These women are happy. Happy in their traditional roles. look back  to 100 years ago, divorce was uncommon and very much unheard of. So what changed? WHo changed? Man? nope, women (in the western world) changed moving from their traditional (and biological role)as nurturer and carer
to moving into a mans environment and taking on male characteristics (being more dominant, more pushy)
the male in turn took some female characteristics (submissive) thus born the wussie! some how the roles became reversed.

PU is about resolving internal issues, taking the power back.

quite faunny how my gran still talks to my grandad 2 years after he died. while today we have couples that will throw electrical appliances at each other...its a power struggle, simply because of media pressure woman no longer knows he role. the constant reading and hearing in our media generated society that she must be the one that wears the pants in the realtion ship.

[Lou]

Also remember that cultural involve how the \"beta\" controlled the alpha by submission to the \"laws\" of forever-marriage.

Think in most of the religions... today the alpha revolution came back... and evolution may offer something (but actually we are involuting, you can see severe betas with shit-girls procreating, whilst in the prehistoric ages they (or we, who knows) should have been eaten by a crocodile )

This is a complete mess...